chip grade antibodies against human aurka (Bethyl)
Structured Review

Chip Grade Antibodies Against Human Aurka, supplied by Bethyl, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 4 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/chip grade antibodies against human aurka/product/Bethyl
Average 92 stars, based on 4 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Nuclear Aurora-A kinase-induced hypoxia signaling drives early dissemination and metastasis in breast cancer: implications for detection of metastatic tumors"
Article Title: Nuclear Aurora-A kinase-induced hypoxia signaling drives early dissemination and metastasis in breast cancer: implications for detection of metastatic tumors
Journal: Oncogene
doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-01969-1
Figure Legend Snippet: A. Representative images of tissue microarray IHC, (n = 206) stained with AURKA/DAB-brown, hematoxylin-nuclei/blue. Scale bar-300 μm. Insets-x250 enlarged areas. B, C Quantification N-AURKA positive(+) cells as in A, 3 randomly-assigned fields, n = 100 cells/field. B Pathological stages (Normal = 32, DCIS = 24, IDC = 72, MIDC-LN = 32, ILC = 24) and C receptor-based subtypes (Normal = 32, TNBC = 39, HER2+ = 32, ER+/PR+ = 30). D WB analysis of nuclear/cytoplasmic fractionations, as indicated. E Quantification of AURKA in cytoplasm/nucleus, percent-of-total, normalized to controls. F Schematic outline of cell line production. G, H Immunofluorescence and WB analysis of AURKA-sublines produced in F stained with AURKA (green), RFP(red), DAPI-nuclei/blue; clones indicated as c1/c2/c3. Scale bar-10 μm. One-way ANOVA, ±S.E.M, Dunnett’s test, ns non-significant.
Techniques Used: Microarray, Staining, Immunofluorescence, Produced, Clone Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: A Experimental design of xenograft study, n = 3 mice/group. B Quantification of Fluorescent-IHC using phospho-AURKA-T288 antibody in tumors. n = 50 mitotic-cells/tumor. C Quantification of final tumor volume/mm3. D Representative H&E images of lung metastases and DAB-IHC images of liver metastases stained with anti-RFP-antibody. Metastases outlined by black line. Scale bar-50 μm. E, F Quantification of metastases: number and area of metastases normalized to total area. G Lung and liver metastasis penetrance in mice treated with vehicle or MLN8237. One-way ANOVA, ±S.E.M. Tukey’s test. H Model of Nuclear-AURKA-HIF1 mediated gene expression. Normoxia: HIF1A is hydroxylated/ubiquitinated by PHDs/VHL resulting in degradation. Hypoxia: low-oxygen stabilizes HIF1A leading to HIF1A/B dimerization/activation, transactivation of hypoxia-response genes. Normoxia+N-AURKA: HIF1A/B activity is increased leading to metastasis. MLN8237 inhibits AURKA activity decreasing metastasis.
Techniques Used: Staining, Gene Expression, Activation Assay, Activity Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: A WB analysis of HIFs in cells with indicated antibodies, DMSO-vehicle or DMOG for 7 h. B Quantification of WB results as in A, fold of change over DMSO-control. C, D Representative images of Immunoprecipitation/WB analysis with indicated antibodies, WCL-whole cell lysate. E Quantification of ChIP qPCR against selected promoter region, normalized to total input. F WB analysis of ChIP (before de-crosslinking). G Mass-spectrometry analysis of AURKA-IP complexes: Venn diagram displaying the numbers of proteins found in the NLS- or NES-AURKA complexes. The 850 proteins/yellow were further filtered, nuclear/blue. Pie-chart showing distribution of N-AURKA binding partners based on functional Panther Gene Ontology terms. Tables showing selected nuclear protein classifications for H RNA-binding and I DNA-binding from PANTHER Gene Ontology. One-way ANOVA, ±S.E.M, Dunnett’s test, ns non-significant.
Techniques Used: Control, Immunoprecipitation, ChIP-qPCR, Mass Spectrometry, Binding Assay, Functional Assay, RNA Binding Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: A Heat-map of differentially expressed genes (DEGs, mean values) in cells. Gene expression (n = 3167) is normalized log2 counts/million. B Principal Component Analysis of RNA-Seq libraries as in A. C Volcano-plot analysis of RNAseq data as in A NLS-AURKA vs. control, log2 fold changes of gene expression on the x-axis, FDR statistical significance (−log10 p value) on the y-axis; upregulated (red), downregulated (black) genes in NLS, all genes (blue). Genes with at least a >1.5 fold change and FDR < 0.01 are displayed. D Visualization of Gene Ontology terms for NLS-AURKA vs. control; up/downregulated GOterms (FDR < 0.1) are depicted as circles; the distance indicates the relationship between terms: closer distance means higher similarity. Color and size of circles indicate significance of differential expression of an individual GO term in log10 p value. E WB analysis of selected RNA-seq target proteins as in A. F Quantification of WB in E, fold change over control. G GSEA comparison NLS-AURKA vs. control for selected GOterm gene sets. H Heat-map of HIF-dependent DEGs. I Predicted upstream regulators: activated (yellow), inhibited (blue) using IPA activation z-score. One-way ANOVA, ±S.E.M, Dunnett’s test, ns non-significant.
Techniques Used: Gene Expression, RNA Sequencing, Control, Quantitative Proteomics, Comparison, Activation Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: A WB analysis of HIFs in cells as indicated, treated with siRNA: control-scr or anti-HIF1A/B. B Quantification of WB results in A, fold of change over siScr. C Individual cell movement tracking-plots toward chemoattractant. Cell lines as indicated. Graphs of D total distance, E cell-body directionality, F cell speed. G qPCR analysis of select genes in control and NLS-AURKA cells with siScr and siHIF1A/B, fold change over control-siScr. H qPCR analysis of FOXM1 in control and NLS-AURKA cells treated with siScr and siHIF1A/B, fold change over control-siScr. I, J qPCR analysis of FOXM1, HIF1A, and HIF1B in control and NLS-AURKA cells treated with siScr and siFOXM1, fold change over control-siScr. HIF1B: (unpaired t test: con-Scr vs NLS-AURKA-Scr). One-way ANOVA, ±S.E.M. Tukey’s test, ns non-significant.
Techniques Used: Control